The honest answer is "it depends," but that's not a useful answer, so here's what it depends on. Statistical consulting is priced in two main ways: hourly and project-based (a fixed quote for a defined scope of work). Independent consultants and small practices commonly bill somewhere in the $100–$300/hour range depending on seniority and specialization; larger firms and litigation-support statisticians can run well above that. But hourly rates alone tell you almost nothing about what a project will actually cost, because the real driver isn't the rate — it's the scope.
Hourly billing puts the schedule risk on you. A fixed quote for a clearly scoped deliverable puts it on the consultant, which is exactly where it belongs if they're the one estimating the work. The tradeoff is that a fixed quote requires an actual scoping conversation first — which is why a real consultation before any quote, not a generic rate card, is the only way to get a number you can plan around.
Two quotes that look far apart often aren't quoting the same thing. Before comparing price, make sure you're comparing scope: does the number include revisions after you see a draft? Does it include a methods write-up your funder or journal will actually accept, or just output? Is reproducible code part of the deliverable, or an extra? A lower number that doesn't include the part you actually need isn't a better price.
If you want a number instead of a range, tell us what you're working on and we'll give you a scoped quote, not a rate card.
One email whenever we publish something new. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
{{ subscribeErrorMsg }}