The honest answer is "it depends," but that's not a useful answer, so here's what it depends on. Statistical consulting is priced in two main ways: hourly and project-based (a fixed quote for a defined scope of work). Rates vary by provider, specialization, and scope. DASS provides a project-specific quote after reviewing the question, expected data condition, deliverables, and timeline. An hourly rate alone does not tell you how much effort those tasks will require.
A fixed fee can suit a clearly defined deliverable with agreed assumptions and boundaries. Hourly billing with a cap or a staged agreement can suit exploratory or diagnostic work whose effort is uncertain. Compare what each arrangement includes, how progress is reported, and how changes require approval. No pricing structure removes the need for a clear scope.
Two quotes that look far apart often aren't quoting the same thing. Before comparing price, make sure you're comparing scope: does the number include revisions after you see a draft? Does it include a methods write-up your funder or journal will actually accept, or just output? Is reproducible code part of the deliverable, or an extra? A lower number that doesn't include the part you actually need isn't a better price.
If you want a number instead of a range, tell us what you're working on and we'll give you a scoped quote, not a rate card.
One email whenever we publish something new. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
{{ subscribeErrorMsg }}