Senior statistical support for grant-funded research — from study design through revise-and-resubmit — so your methods hold up to peer review, IRB, and program officers.
Reviewer asked for post hoc power? Study section doubts your pilot effect size? Diagnosed Cases with checks, options, reviewer wording, and R code.
Typical deliverables are listed below. Your proposal specifies the included outputs, available data, timeline and fee. Choose a focused project or ongoing support. See ways to work with DASS →
Shorten a survey or assessment with content-constrained item selection and precision targeted to your research decisions. Explore the method, check initial feasibility, and prepare your project scope.
Explore survey and assessment shortening →A sample of the federally- and foundation-funded research our team has supported as PI, Co-PI, methodologist, or statistician.
Statistical support on a multi-site randomized controlled trial testing whether a belonging intervention improves STEM outcomes for women and underrepresented students.
Co-Principal Investigator on a federal trial helping educators plan, implement, and maintain evidence-based interventions in real classrooms.
Longitudinal analysis and data management for a national R&D center evaluating how states measure school performance for students with disabilities.
Automated outcomes reporting for VALOR-QI, a VA and American Heart Association program to improve cholesterol care for veterans with cardiovascular disease across 50 VA medical centers. The 2026 JACC: Advances paper analyzed 88,778 veterans, including 24,610 with 24-month LDL-C measurements.
We had an unrealistically tight timeline, and Dr. Yel jumped in without hesitation — not only met the deadline, but delivered a little earlier than we anticipated. He took the time to understand the situation behind the data and the implications of every insight. We know who to go to for future work like this.
I recruited Nedim for his analytical skills and research abilities. He brought very strong quantitative research skills and the interpersonal ability to work effectively with a wide range of people from diverse backgrounds. He excelled at ferreting out and interpreting information from multiple sources. My highest recommendation.
Yes. Revise-and-resubmit support is part of the work, from running the analysis the reviewer is implicitly asking for to wording the response. Our guide to responding when a reviewer challenges your model explains the usual patterns, and the Analysis Clinic has worked cases with R code.
Yes. Grant and IRB methods sections and a power-analysis memo are typical deliverables. The section should make the design, the sample-size justification and the planned analysis match each other.
Yes. Deliverables include reproducible R code that you keep.
Yes. A single power analysis, one round of analysis, a methods section or a reviewer response are all normal engagements. You can also retain us as an ongoing methods partner.
We don't publish a price list because cost depends on scope. The free 30-minute consult ends with a scoped proposal that includes methods, a timeline and a fixed quote, whether or not you hire us. If you have a deadline, such as a resubmission date, tell us on the first call so the timeline is built around it. We reply to inquiries within one business day.
A free 30-minute consult — bring the reviewer comments or the grant RFP, leave with a plan.
Book a free project consultation